Bone Health Clinic Pharmaceutical Management Survey

Section 1 – Practice Profile

  1. What best describes your organization?
    ☐ Independent orthopedic practice
    ☐ Multi-specialty group
    ☐ Hospital-owned practice
    ☐ Academic medical center
    ☐ Other (please specify): __________

  2. Approximate number of osteoporosis or bone health patients managed annually:
    ☐ <100 ☐ 100–499 ☐ 500–999 ☐ 1,000+

  3. Does your practice currently provide in-office osteoporosis injection therapy (e.g., Prolia, Evenity)?
    ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Planning to start within 12 months

  4. Who manages drug purchasing and inventory for your practice?
    ☐ Physician-owner(s)
    ☐ Practice administrator
    ☐ Pharmacy or infusion manager
    ☐ Hospital or corporate supply chain
    ☐ Other: __________

Section 2 – Current Model: Buy-and-Bill

  1. Do you currently purchase osteoporosis biologics under a buy-and-bill model?
    ☐ Yes ☐ No

  2. How significant is buy-and-bill inventory cost as a financial burden to your practice?
    Scale: 1 = Minimal → 5 = Severe burden
    ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5

  3. What challenges do you face under the buy-and-bill model? (Select all that apply)
    ☐ Upfront cash flow / working capital requirements
    ☐ Reimbursement delays or denials
    ☐ Expired / wasted inventory
    ☐ Administrative complexity
    ☐ Payer mix variability
    ☐ None / minimal issues
    ☐ Other: __________

  4. Have reimbursement levels for Prolia or Evenity changed your willingness to continue buy-and-bill?
    ☐ No impact
    ☐ Somewhat less willing
    ☐ Much less willing
    ☐ Considering discontinuation

Section 3 – Awareness & Perception of Consignment

  1. How familiar are you with the concept of consigned drug inventory?
    ☐ Not familiar ☐ Somewhat familiar ☐ Very familiar

  2. Have you ever used a consignment model in your practice (for any medication or implant)?
    ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Not sure

  3. If yes, in what context?
    ☐ Orthopedic implants ☐ Oncology biologics ☐ Other: __________

  4. What potential advantages do you see in a consignment model for bone health drugs? (Select up to 3)
    ☐ Eliminates upfront inventory costs
    ☐ Reduces financial risk
    ☐ Enables more consistent patient access
    ☐ Simplifies purchasing and cash flow
    ☐ Easier to adopt biosimilars
    ☐ Other: __________

  5. What concerns would you have about using a consignment model? (Select all that apply)
    ☐ Legal/regulatory compliance (anti-kickback, etc.)
    ☐ Contract complexity
    ☐ Loss of control over inventory
    ☐ Operational logistics with 3PL/distributor
    ☐ Data reporting requirements
    ☐ Other: __________

Section 4 – Adoption Interest

  1. If a compliant consignment solution were available today, how interested would your practice be in participating?
    ☐ Very interested ☐ Moderately interested ☐ Unsure ☐ Not interested

  2. Which product transition would be most relevant for your practice?
    ☐ Prolia → Denosumab biosimilar (when available)
    ☐ Evenity (Romosozumab)
    ☐ Other injectable osteoporosis agents

  3. What support would your practice need to adopt a consignment model? (Select all that apply)
    ☐ Legal and compliance review
    ☐ Integration with existing billing workflows
    ☐ Training for staff
    ☐ Data/reporting automation
    ☐ 3PL logistics coordination
    ☐ Financial modeling or revenue impact analysis

  4. Would you be willing to participate in a pilot program testing a consignment model for bone health biologics?
    ☐ Yes ☐ Possibly, with more information ☐ No

  5. If yes or possibly, please provide a contact person for follow-up:
    Name: __________ Title: __________ Email: __________ Phone: __________

Section 5 – Open Feedback

  1. In your own words, what would make a consignment model appealing or unattractive to your practice?
    (Open-ended text field)

  2. Do you have any additional comments or suggestions regarding how a consignment model could support bone health service growth?
    (Open-ended text field)